Future Monitoring & Verification Challenges

SAND2000-1531C. Sandia National Laboratory

The Computer Modeling System for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation (CMSAC) for Warhead Dismantlement and Transparency
Voznyuk, Rodion et al.
2000

PU/CEES Report No. 314. Center for Energy and Environmental Studies. School of Engineering and Applied Science. Princeton University.

U.S.-Russian Warhead Dismantlement Transparency: The Status, Problems, and Proposals
Bukharin and Luongo
1999

LA-UR-97-2812. Los Alamos National Laboratory

Technical Challenges for Dismantlement Verification
Olinger, Chad T. et al.
1997

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation

Transparency and Verification Options: An Initial Analysis of Approaches for Monitoring Warhead Dismantlement
1997

United States Department of Energy. Federal Register, Vol.62, No.13.

Record of Decision for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
1997

JSR-92-331. JASON. The MITRE Corporation

Verification of Dismantlement of Nuclear Warheads and Controls on Nuclear Materials
Drell, S. et al
1993

UCRL-JC-105885. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Treaty Verification with an Uncertain Partner
Weissenberger, Stein
1991

OTA-ISC-488. Office of Technology Assessment

Verification Technologies: Managing Research and Development for Cooperative Arms Control Monitoring Measures
1991

Note: The content on this website and in this resource collection does not necessarily reflect the views of the members of the International Partnership.

The Partnership is steered by countries with and without nuclear weapons: Phase I working groups were chaired by Australia, the Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland, Sweden, the UK, and the U.S.

See who else is involved